In a recent post on Truth Social at 8:24 PM EST on December 7, 2024, Donald Trump unleashed a scathing critique directed at an individual he describes as a “disgusting slob” and identifies as a Democrat political operative. According to Trump, this individual played a role in financing a legal action against him by a woman accusing him of rape, a charge he vehemently denies, having been found not guilty in the trial.
Trump goes on to highlight what he characterizes as the woman’s lack of detailed recollection, asserting that she couldn’t remember essential information such as the year and decade in question. He emphasizes what he deems as “amazingly inconsistent” statements made by the woman during interviews. The former president portrays the trial resulting from these accusations as disgraceful and very unfair, presumably expressing his discontent with the legal proceedings.
Moreover, Trump reveals that his lawyer advised him against attending the trial, citing that it was beneath him and that the prosecution had no viable case. Trump, however, now critiques this advice as not being in his best interest, indicating a reconsideration of the decision not to participate actively in the legal proceedings.
According to Mediaite, former President Donald Trump expressed strong disapproval of the civil fraud case against him in New York, characterizing it as a “Kangaroo Court Witch Hunt.” In a statement posted on Truth Social, Trump criticized the proceedings, alleging that it is led by a “totally corrupt and Racist A.G.” (Attorney General) and a highly partisan judge who, according to Trump, had made a decision before the trial began.
Trump objected to the valuation of Mar-a-Lago at $18 million, questioning its accuracy. He highlighted the support of a finance expert who reportedly stated that Trump did nothing wrong and built a great company. Trump argued that the case should be dropped, expressing concern that the trial’s outcome could deter businesses from moving to New York.
In his statement, Trump lamented the lack of a jury in the trial, emphasizing that he was not afforded a fair opportunity. He reiterated his claim of innocence, asserting that the judge is aware that they are not guilty but have instead contributed to job creation and built a successful company.
