Newt Gingrich, who used to be a key figure as the Republican Speaker of the House and now contributes to Fox News, has some serious worries about the recent decision by the Colorado Supreme Court. They ruled to keep former President Donald Trump off the ballot, and this has raised some major concerns for Gingrich.
According to a report from the Conservative Brief on December 23, 2023, Gingrich is quite alarmed about the potential effects of the Colorado ruling on Trump’s political journey. He’s not just talking about how it might impact the upcoming 2024 election; Gingrich is warning that it could spell disaster for the whole future of elections in the United States.
On “The Ingraham Angle,” Gingrich didn’t hold back, describing the situation as potentially catastrophic. Drawing attention to the fact that a whopping 1,360,000 Coloradans had voted for Trump in the previous election, he expressed deep concerns about the decision made by four lawyers to prevent him from being on the ballot. Gingrich sees this move as a sign of what he calls “establishment arrogance.”
Highlighting a concerning ratio, Gingrich pointed out that having just one lawyer blocking every 340,000 Trump voters is not sustainable. He drew historical parallels, likening it to situations in the past, such as the refusal to include Abraham Lincoln on the ballot in 1860. This comparison suggests that the recent decision might be seen as a challenge to democratic principles and historical precedents.
Gingrich made a strong point that the American people are not likely to accept being told that they can’t choose the presidential candidate they prefer. By drawing parallels to countries facing political unrest, such as Venezuela, Nicaragua, and Cuba, he issued a warning that Democrats might be on the verge of provoking a confrontation that could be disastrous for the United States. This comparison suggests that restricting the choices of the electorate could lead to significant political turmoil, which Gingrich sees as a perilous path for the country.
This perspective from Gingrich aligns with comments made by Texas Lt. Governor Dan Patrick regarding the possibility of keeping President Joe Biden off the 2024 ballot in Texas. Patrick connected this idea to concerns about Biden’s handling of the border crisis, citing worries about 8 million people crossing the border during his presidency. Gingrich echoed his support for Patrick’s stance, tying it to what he perceives as Biden’s intentional and harmful immigration policy.
Gingrich argued that the situation at the open border is, in itself, a form of rebellion against sovereignty and the rule of law. He went further to predict that the next phase could involve the left pushing for voting rights for illegal immigrants. This suggests a broader concern about the potential impact of immigration policies on electoral processes and the integrity of the voting system.
Gingrich expressed deep concern, contending that the United States is edging dangerously close to a real confrontation. He raised questions about the motives of the White House and Democrats, suggesting a potential desire to orchestrate civil unrest before the 2024 election. This viewpoint reflects apprehension about the political climate and the potential consequences of controversial decisions on the country’s stability.
In response to the 4-3 decision by the Colorado Supreme Court, citing the insurrection clause in the 14th Amendment as grounds for removing him from the 2024 ballot, former President Donald Trump reacted swiftly. The use of the insurrection clause in this context adds a layer of complexity, bringing constitutional considerations into the debate and fueling further political tension.
The recent decision spurred Gingrich, among others, to express concerns about the broader impact on democratic processes and the possibility of increased political tensions in the run-up to the next election.
Gingrich highlighted the potential consequences of preventing Trump from being on the ballot, emphasizing the importance of states having significant freedom in these matters. He cautioned against a possible intense and irrational conflict, warning that such a scenario could lead to a genuine confrontation.
Former President Trump also joined in amplifying these concerns, contributing to the escalating discourse around the Colorado Supreme Court’s divisive decision. This discourse casts shadows on the nation’s democratic integrity, creating heightened tensions as the 2024 election approaches. The decision not only affects the immediate political landscape but also raises questions about the principles and fairness of the democratic processes in the United States.
