Former Watergate prosecutor Nick Akerman expressed skepticism about Donald Trump’s chances of securing presidential immunity related to the January 6 insurrection during an appearance on MSNBC.
“Former president stands no chance of winning, and I expect him to eventually end up in ‘the big house,'” Nick stated. Akerman confidently asserted that Trump’s pursuit of absolute immunity in the criminal sphere is baseless, dismissing it as a fabrication lacking constitutional or legal foundation.
Nick Akerman dismissed Trump’s legal team’s efforts to sway the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in favor of the former president, labeling their argument as something “made up out of whole cloth.” According to Akerman, the proposed immunity has no grounding in the country’s laws and is unlikely to be affirmed by the circuit court.
Looking ahead to the trial scheduled for March 4th, presided over by Judge Tanya Chutkan, Akerman expressed a pessimistic outlook for Trump, as reported by Raw Story on Saturday, January 13, 2024.
Nick Akerman asserted that once the trial commences and the jury is sworn in, Trump’s fate is sealed. He confidently predicted a conviction, emphasizing that Trump’s only legal strategy revolves around delaying the proceedings rather than contesting the facts or the law.
In a stark assessment, Akerman stated that Trump is “on his way to the big house,” emphasizing the inevitability of a conviction once the trial is underway. This narrative highlights Trump’s primary concern – not the legal merit of his case but the strategic use of delay tactics.
While Nick Akerman’s analysis focuses on Trump’s legal battles, another story unfolds in the realm of judicial appointments. Legal experts and commentators are expressing reservations about U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, appointed by Trump in 2020. The judge recently denied a motion by Department of Justice special counsel Jack Smith, raising concerns about her impartiality.
Smith’s motion sought to compel disclosure of whether Trump planned to use an advice-of-counsel defense, requiring him to submit potentially privileged communications for discovery. The denial by Judge Cannon adds complexity to the legal landscape surrounding Trump’s defense strategy.
As Trump navigates legal battles on multiple fronts, including challenges to his ability to conduct business and political endorsements, the trajectory of his post-presidential era remains uncertain. The convergence of legal proceedings and political dynamics sets the stage for a consequential period in Trump’s post-presidential journey.
The legal scrutiny faced by Donald Trump intensifies as experts question the legitimacy of his immunity bid and scrutinize judicial decisions that may impact his defense strategy and business endeavors. The unfolding events suggest a complex and challenging road ahead for the former president, raising questions about the ultimate outcome of these legal and political battles.
