The Second Circuit Court of Appeals has dashed former President Donald Trump’s hopes to delay his defamation civil suit trial filed by E. Jean Carroll, according to a report by the Raw Story on Friday, December 29.
With the trial set to commence in just over two weeks, the anticipation is rife, and legal experts predict that Trump might find himself on the losing end, facing the prospect of handing over millions more to the New York City writer.
Former federal prosecutor Glenn Kirschner shared his insights during a compelling appearance on MSNBC, shedding light on what might transpire in this high-stakes legal drama.
Kirschner, known for his astute analysis, speculated that Trump could be facing a substantial financial setback, potentially doubling the $5 million he was previously ordered to pay in the initial defamation trial.
“This is ‘The Defamation Case: The Sequel,'” Kirschner quipped, injecting a touch of humor into the gravity of the situation.
He went on to emphasize the recurring pattern of behavior exhibited by Trump and his associates, likening it to a playbook where they not only engage in defamatory actions but seemingly revel in repeating them.
Kirschner drew parallels between Trump and his attorney Rudy Giuliani, pointing out a similar instance where Giuliani, taking a cue from Trump, defamed Georgia state election workers on the courthouse steps.
Despite the repetitive nature of these tactics, Kirschner asserted that this was far from a winning strategy.
“Their luck will run out,” he remarked, alluding to the increasing pressure and legal scrutiny closing in on Trump and his associates.
Reflecting on the initial trial’s outcome, where a jury awarded an aggregate of $5 million, Kirschner confidently predicted that this time around, the stakes could be even higher.
“I would look for double that this time around,” he stated, leaving host Alex Witt in awe, who could only respond with a simple yet emphatic, “Wow.”
As the legal landscape braces for “The Defamation Case Sequel,” it becomes evident that the repercussions of Trump’s actions may extend far beyond the courtroom.
The potential for a significant financial judgment looms large, painting a picture of a former president grappling with the consequences of his words and deeds.
The parallels drawn between the two defamation cases highlight a concerning pattern, showcasing a brazen disregard for legal consequences.
Kirschner’s assessment underscores the belief that the walls are indeed closing in on Trump, suggesting that his luck may be running thin.
In the coming weeks, all eyes will be on the courtroom as the drama unfolds, offering a front-row seat to a legal battle that could not only shape Trump’s post-presidential legacy but also set a precedent for accountability in the face of defamation.
The stakes are high, the anticipation palpable, and as the trial approaches, the question remains: will this be the reckoning Trump cannot escape?
Only time will tell, but the prospect of double trouble on the financial front adds a layer of intensity to an already gripping legal saga.
