Former President Donald Trump expressed concern over the potential repercussions of his ongoing trial in New York City. Trump warned Americans that the actions of New York State Supreme Court Judge Arthur Engoron and Attorney General Letitia James could have a chilling effect on businesses in the state.
As reported by The Gateway Pundit on Friday, December 8, 2023, Trump suggested that no business would be willing to stay or return to New York if he were to lose his case.
During a break in his civil fraud trial, Trump emphasized the gravity of the situation, stating, “Businesses are watching this case. No business will go back into New York. No business will, frankly, stay in New York. A lot of businesses are talking about leaving New York because of this action.”
The trial revolves around allegations from James that Trump and the Trump Organization fraudulently inflated property values to gain financial advantages
Despite the serious nature of the accusations, some, including former federal prosecutor Andrew McCarthy, have pointed out that the case lacks alleged victims, with no one having complained about the supposed fraud.
The trial took a peculiar turn in September when Judge Engoron valued the Trump Organization’s Mar-a-Lago Club in Palm Beach, Florida, at a seemingly low $18 million. Attorney General James is seeking $250 million in penalties and a ban on Trump conducting business in New York.
Critics, such as Ron Filipkowski, editor-in-chief of MeidasTouch.com, have shared concerns online, highlighting Trump’s assertion that businesses may leave the state if the trial does not go in his favor. Filipkowski posted a clip online, quoting Trump as saying, “Trump says all businesses in NY will leave the state if he loses his case.”
While the specifics of the case have been compared to evaluating a trial in the Third Reich’s “People’s Court,” the focus has shifted to the perceived bias of James and Engoron
Critics argue that their actions reflect a form of “Trump Derangement Syndrome,” suggesting that their motivations are driven by a personal vendetta against the former president rather than a pursuit of justice.
Trump’s warning to other business owners about the potential consequences resonates with the broader principle that no business can operate confidently under the looming threat of biased actors within the legal system.
In sounding this alarm, Trump aims to highlight the broader implications of what he perceives as an unjust persecution that could set a precedent affecting businesses across New York.
In essence, Trump’s claim underscores the intersection of legal proceedings and political motivations, raising concerns about the impact on the business environment in New York and the potential ramifications for businesses facing similar circumstances in the future.
